![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
this article shows an argument between pro- and anti-medical marijuana "advocates"(???)
The thing I noticed right away is the word "smoked" in the "anti" article. I thought, that's odd. So I search text for "smok"... and sure as shit... the only piece to talk about smoked pot is the anti article.
The pro article recognizes that there are many different methods to imbibe MJ. Tinctures, and vaporization are just two examples that pop off the top of my head (these are not mentioned specifically).
There are many problems I find in the debunking. Some very specious (sp?) arguments...
Wow.
The thing I noticed right away is the word "smoked" in the "anti" article. I thought, that's odd. So I search text for "smok"... and sure as shit... the only piece to talk about smoked pot is the anti article.
The pro article recognizes that there are many different methods to imbibe MJ. Tinctures, and vaporization are just two examples that pop off the top of my head (these are not mentioned specifically).
There are many problems I find in the debunking. Some very specious (sp?) arguments...
Wow.
Tags:
