Reading up on Anxiety... As I'm not sure [livejournal.com profile] vesicular quite gets what I'm talking about. Anyways... I have a mix of panic disorder, social anxiety disorder and intermittent explosive disorder, combined with what is another compulsive behavior (scalp picking)...

This is interesting:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_space

I have a co-worker who interferes not in "personal space" but "intimate space" (that is, when she's showing me stuff, she's literally bumping up next to me... That's irritating. Anyways... That's just an anecdote...

I've thought about CBT, as an approach. But it's so methodical... And that's another issue of mine. I tried to do journaling for two different therapists, and never was able to get into the habit. Supposedly CBT is very effective. Exposure and Response Prevention seems like another option... A subset, I guess, of CBT.

This leads me to... "Flight Zone":

Tame animals have no flight zone; that is, they will allow a person to approach and touch them. Wild, feral, and unbroken animals can have very large flight zones.


Funny how wild animals are "unbroken" and that we have to "break" them in order to make them tame. (Slave Screams! He's being beat into submission... I should note I accidentally wrote "we wild animals" in the sentence above, initially.)

I also have a very strong startle reaction, which I've noted in a somewhat recent post (in the past month, I believe).

Anyways, I wanted to clarify, in a sense, that I don't just feel "anxious" or "nervous" around people. I have very strong space issues and anxiety issues which lead me to be very sensitive to conditions, including startling noise, violations of personal space, panic, and rage. It's not merely being "inept". It's much more and much scarier. People are not supposed to hit metal objects and dent them out of emotional rage. They are not supposed to ram their bumper into a truck that's preventing them from parking in their appointed parking spot.

(no subject)

Mar. 30th, 2005 12:37 am
symbioidlj: (Default)
awesome synchronicity just now:

i'm mildly hyperthymic now(after yesterdays dysthymia), so i decided to do a little more research on cyclothymia(been a while since I read about it).  Cyclothymia is a mild form of "manic depression" or more properly "Bipolar disorder".  My cycles seem to be less frequent, which is good.

anyways hyperthymia is a mild mania, the opposite of dysthymia, which is a negative state of mind, darkened, joyless.

ok, so i type in hyperthymia in google, and one of the links is a list of psychology definitions (based off the dsm-iv), as I'm reading further down, I notice "delusional" as a definition:

a false belief based on incorrect inference about external reality that sustained despite what almost everyone else believes and despite what constitutes incontrovertible and obvious proof or evidence to the contrary. [DSM-IV]
as I'm reading this, the thoughts of all the bullshit happening now in our political system and the theocratic push that's happening, especially with regards to evolution and the "pro-life" push, as well as "activist judges"(isn't it funny how the right takes exactly what they do, and label their opponent as one who engages in that conduct... Judge not, lest ye be judged, for in the manner in which ye judge, so also shall ye be judged...)

are not these beliefs in opposition to what constitutes incontrovertible and obvious proof or evidence  to the contrary?

so I had clicked on a link earlier in a metafilter post, and it was open in another tab.  as i began to read

<a href="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/17852">this article</a> by Bill Moyers (already, from the first paragraph, I'm hooked... i recommend it!!!), he says "...one story after another drives home the fact that the delusional is no longer marginal but has come in from the fringe to influence the seats of power."

exactly what the fuck i was thinking.

read more at <a href="symbioid.blogspot.com">my blog</a>

also available as <lj user="symbioid_rss">  again... feel free to subscribe on your favorite blog aggregator, or on LJ.  I'd like to hear your reactions and thoughts on all this.

(no subject)

Sep. 18th, 2001 08:58 pm
symbioidlj: (Default)
Cybernetic culture research unit Go there. Now. For anyone interested in electronic music theory, and cool shit like that. I mean, it's fucking awesome, and if you don't go you're missing a shitload of very very very very very cool shit. This is what I'm thinking about a lot of the time, even though I don't write about it.
--------
Something I've been thinking about today: Time. The linearity. The limits and restraints it places upon us in it's one dimensionality. I wish we could move to a multi-modal time. The west has linear time, with it's discrete units of measurement. Quantitative. The east has it's cyclic time, with it's analog states of change and evolution and recurrence. Qualitative. What we need is spiral-time. Time that is conic. That is linear and cyclic. but not only forward, but also backwards, so it's like four-dimensional. The three dimensions(1 forward, and then along that axis, 2 cyclic(up, down, forward, back)... But add the reversal element and you have 4 dimensional time. Our whole conception of reality is somehow tainted by one-dimensional time. And I don't know if it's really a physical thing, as science claims to exist, or if it's just beyond our ken. I mean, cyclical time is pretty much beyond our reach, because we perceive one lifetime and that' all we can deal with. And as such, we have to work within the confines of said time.

Confines. Something else that I've been thinking about. Limitations of technology are what the artist needs to understand and work with. The greatest artist is one who learns how to use the limiting factors of the media, tool and substrate, to his/her advantage.

Language is limited because we speak linearly. We write linearly. We read linearly. We perceive within one frame. What intrigues me about multimedia is the ability to superimpose a multidimensionality upon our perception, so that we can see 2 images at once or, music, by it's very nature, is multi-dimensional. But reading and even listening is unidimensional. Even if we put multiple words on a screen, it's still hard to absorb it all, unless it's short and to the point. Which is what modern media does. Politicos know this. They cram 3 word phrases into 2 seconds so we can all be of 1 mind.

I'm interested in the opposite. Sensory overload. Data-choke. Eye-gag(i-gag?)... The sort of overcrowded space with words that bombard you with so much that your eyes gag on it, and you just cut thinking out entirely and exist in a kind of automatic limbo. There are two paths to psychic liberation, the serene and the frenetic. The trance state from the rhythm, and the static state from the ambience. But reality pokes it's head through breaks and crevasses in the sound. Break-beats, dead-silence, jarring static, noise breaking through the steady hum... But in words. In text.

So, umm. Don't forget to go to that link.

Profile

symbioidlj: (Default)
symbioidlj

November 2015

S M T W T F S
1 234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 4th, 2025 05:04 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios