Apr. 6th, 2005

quick note/idea...

it just popped in my head now, and i've not fully evaluated implications, and i'm heading to bed, but want it down, and have you add your insights to this.

privatization sucks.

most on my friends list agree with that.  some more than others.

but i'm not a big traditional "liberal," so I'm not necessarily opposed to thinking about alternative systems of things.  this includes reducing gov't waste.

i was reading something about gingrich, and for some reason, the idea popped into my head...  privatization usually means putting a service into the private MARKET which has a profit motive for it.

Now, what if there is something else.  Instead of the government providing services, and instead of turning it over to profit-based corporations, what if people can form non-profit orgs, that will deal with these issues.  However, the money will not be from individuals, there will still be a collective/tax-based system, but would this help eliminate waste???

Would this be less, more or equally (in)efficient?

Are there any good reasons for doing this, and what are the possible negative effects...

must sleep.

thanks for any insight...

P.S. my overall hunches are that this is a dumb idea, and that it's not going to either be more efficient or less complicated, that it could open the way to even more fraud(this time through the organizations) than a regular government system, but perhaps less fraud than a pure corporate system.  bah.
but I just had to subscribe to the RSS feed for this blog called, conveniently: THIS IS FUN TO MAKE A BLOG ON THE COMPUTER WEBSITE

The language seems to have schizophrenic elements/patterns in it. I'm just not certain. Whatever it is it's funny. Think Wesley Willis without all that doberman-dick-sucking and chevrolets....

and MORE WIGS!

(no subject)

Apr. 6th, 2005 08:47 pm
symbioidlj: (Default)
"It is impossible to imagine a Newt Gingrich responding, say, to LBJ's Great Society by concocting its own expensive plan to feed the poor black man--but we fully expect that a Democrat who loses an election will suddenly start to reconsider his opposition to preemtpive invasion and Reaganomics.

We expect these things, so they strike us as logical when we see them happen. But they make no sense. A merely cynical opposition party would be emboldened by poll numbers showing majority opposition to the war to court those votes. And a moral one would seize upon news of the sort coming out of Britain to argue to not only to their own voters (who would unanimously support them in this aim), but to the country at large, that the invasion of Iraq was based upon a fallacy, illegal and impeachable.

But the Democratic leaders do neither. Instead, they tell 53 percent of the country that they are mistaken, and throw their chips in with the other 47 percent, who incidentally support the other party and are not likely to ever budge. They then go further and try to argue that fighting the war on terror requires abandoning health care, education and Social Security--an idea that, let's face it, makes no fucking sense at all.

Franklin Roosevelt never argued anything like that, and he fought a global world war against two mighty industrial powers. But now 4000 retards in caves are going to close down the entire American school system. If that is the Democratic idea of looking 'strong,' one hates to imagine what weakness would look like. "

http://www.freezerbox.com/archive/article.asp?id=338

(no subject)

Apr. 6th, 2005 10:14 pm
symbioidlj: (Default)
song title idea: hegemonites

(no subject)

Apr. 6th, 2005 10:18 pm
symbioidlj: (Default)
i'm gonna name my son Zebediah Cornelius.

I like the sound of that.  Zeb for short.

(no subject)

Apr. 6th, 2005 10:35 pm
symbioidlj: (Default)
is there an IVGDB?

Internet Video Game Database?

I was thinking of this after finishing Beyond Good and Evil (GET IT!)  Brent especially, I think you'd like it.  Did you play it Nathan?  For some reason I think you may have, though I don't know why...

  It's tough, and short... but it's fun, and the artistic direction is great.  The voice acting, I think, is wonderful.  I was a little frustrated with the boss battle, but I never felt intimidated by it.  I was worried that since I only had 4 hearts and no opportunity to get more, that I'd be fucked, unless I went WAY back to a very old previous save.  Fortunately, I kept trying and after a couple days (maybe 2-5 hours max) I got it down.  In fact, I must've been in the zone, cuz even though I was doing well, I totally thought I had more to go.  Then BAM, the fight was finished.  I swear that I actually had to fight further before.  I don't know if it was just an illusion or some sort of adjusting mechanism in the game for difficulty/skill...

Anyways...

IVGDB.

I was watching the credits and all the people that worked on it, and I thought about my <lj user="vesicular">'s and my friend Rob who works on games, and how many games he worked on.  I thought about how there's some really great games, and people should be credited, and why not have a real big repository of as much info as possible on games.  Does this exist?  I mean, I know there's lots of sites for systems, but is there a central site that has all sorts of info...

Consoles, arcade, handheld systems...  hardware info??? processors, system design, system flaws.  basic stats(sales, etc...) small "bio"s as it were of various hardware systems...

Then credits for games, publishers, developers, each persons projects...  This includes sound and art design, direction, programming, every thing in a game, a great database of people involved in the process, and stats about the game (tech specs, sales info, sequels, etc...)

Bios of famous people in the industry.

whatthink?

(no subject)

Apr. 6th, 2005 11:02 pm
symbioidlj: (Default)
damnit!  John Zerzan is in town.  Speaking  on the campus, and i know shit about the campus.

tomorrow night.

he i should really read him now, because my frame of mind is starting to be in tune with his.  sorta.  maybe a cross between him and Buddha.


FYI:  John Zerzan is an anti-civilization/anarchist philosopher(???)  You may recall the WTO protests in Seattle in 99.  The "Black Bloc" contingent of anarchists, tend towards his thought processes.  He's maintained a friendship with Ted Kaczynski for a while.

I'm just trying to put my latest views into context.  I don't know much of the writing in this vein of thinking.  I know some from reading Anarchy magazine, but that's not the real deep parts of the philosophy.

I guess I plan on reading "Elements of Refusal" as one of my next projects.

Oh, am I weird for not really being a fan of fiction?  I feel like I'm some sort of freak, since most people I know really love fiction.  HHGTTG is pretty much the main fiction book that I've really enjoyed.  OK, wait... Encyclopedia Brown rocked!  As did Brer Rabbit and Frog'n'Toad.  But apart from that...  eh...

OK, behind cut is some text and links to sites...

---
http://www.insurgentdesire.org.uk/notaprimitivist.htm

There are several strands of development which seem to have more or less coalesced to form the current primitivist mélange of theories and practices, at least within North America (I'm not as familiar with British primitivism). But two or three strands stand out as the most influential and important: (1) the strand growing out of Detroit's anarcho-Marxist Black & Red and the anarchists contributing to the Fifth Estate, including for awhile (2) John Zerzan, although he and the FE eventually parted ways over disagreements about the status and interpretation of agriculture, culture and domestication. Thirdly (3) some activists coming out of the Earth First! milieu, often influenced by deep ecologists, promote a "Back to the Pleistocene" perspective (the Pleistocene, being the geologic period during which the human species emerged).
Fredy Perlman and the Fifth Estate

Although there have been hints of radical primitivism within--and even before the advent of--the modern anarchist movement, contemporary primitivism owes most to Fredy Perlman and the Detroit Black & Red collective through which his work was published, beginning in the 1960s. Most influential of all has been his visionary reconstruction of the origins and development of civilization, Against His-Story, Against Leviathan published in 1983. In this work, Perlman suggested that civilization originated due to the relatively harsh living conditions (in one place and time) which were seen by the tribal elite to require the development of a system of public waterways. The successful building of this system of public waterways required the actions of many individuals in the manner of a social machine under the direction of the tribal elite. And the social machine that was born became the first Leviathan, the first civilization, which grew and reproduced through wars, enslavement and the creation of ever greater social machinery. The situation we now face is a world in which the progeny of that original civilization have now successfully taken over the globe and conquered nearly all human communities. But, as Perlman points out, though almost all humanity is now trapped within civilizations, within Leviathans, there is still resistance. And, in fact, the development of civilizations from their beginnings on has always faced resistance from every non-civilized, free human community. History is the story of early civilizations destroying the relatively freer communities around them, incorporating them or exterminating them, and the succeeding story of civilizations wrestling with each other, civilizations exterminating, incorporating or subjugating other civilizations, up to the present day. Yet resistance is still possible, and we can all trace our ancestral lineages to people who were once stateless, moneyless and in some profound sense more free.

...

John Zerzan, probably now the most well-known torch-bearer for primitivism in North America, started questioning the origins of social alienation in a series of essays also published in the Fifth Estate throughout the '80s. These essays eventually found their way into his collection Elements of Refusal (1988, and a second edition in 1999). They included extreme critiques of central aspects of human culture--time, language, number and art--and an influential critique of agriculture, the watershed change in human society which Zerzan calls "the basis of civilization." (1999, p.73) However, while these "origins" essays, as they are often called, were published in the Fifth Estate, they were not always welcomed. And, in fact, each issue of FE in which they appeared usually included commentaries rejecting his conclusions in no uncertain terms. Eventually, when the Fifth Estate collective tired of publishing his originary essays, and when Zerzan was finding it harder and harder to endure the FE's obvious distaste for his line of investigation, Zerzan turned to other venues for publication, including this magazine, Anarchy, Michael William's short-lived Demolition Derby, and ultimately England's Green Anarchist as well, among others. A second collection of his essays, Future Primitive and Other Essays, was co-published by Anarchy/C.A.L. Press in association with Autonomedia in 1994. And, additionally, he has edited two important primitivist anthologies, Questioning Technology (co-edited by Alice Carnes, 1988, with a second edition published in 1991) and most recently Against Civilization (1999).

John Zerzan may be most notorious for the blunt, no-nonsense conclusions of his originary critiques. In these essays, and in his subsequent writings--which will be familiar to readers of Anarchy magazine, he ultimately rejects all symbolic culture as alienation and a fall from a pre-civilized, pre-domesticated, pre-division-of-labor, primitive state of human nature. He has also become notorious in some circles for his embrace of the Unabomber, to whom he dedicated the second edition of Elements of Refusal, indicating for those who might have been unsure, that he really is serious about his critiques and our need to develop a fundamentally critical, uncompromising practice.

...
For John Zerzan, primitivism is first and foremost a stance demanding an end to all possible symbolic alienations and all division of labor in order that we experience the world as a reclaimed unity of experience without need for religion, art or other symbolic compensations.
---

Profile

symbioidlj: (Default)
symbioidlj

November 2015

S M T W T F S
1 234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 16th, 2025 07:03 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios